Your iOS app, ready for the iPhone Fold.
A static + pixel audit that scores your app 0–100 against the foldable requirements, estimates the port in hours, and ships it featured-ready on the 7.8in inner display.
917859Open-source apps already indexed
The Fold-Ready Index so far
What you get
A measurement, a plan, and a ship date.
One pipeline from source tree to featured-ready. Each tier feeds the next, so you never re-explain your app.
Static audit
Seven checks against the iOS 27 foldable requirements. You get a 0–100 Fold-Ready Score, a grade, and a port estimate in hours — in minutes, not weeks.
self-serve · freeCaptured-layout pass
We build your app and open it on the 7.8in inner display. Every finding cites file:line, so your team ships fixes instead of reading essays.
in the full reportPorting service
Engineers who shipped foldable UI port your app behind a fixed price and a date. Featured-ready on day one, QA'd on device, before launch.
fixed pricePricing
Pay for the port, not the guesswork.
Audit yourself for free. Buy the captured pass when you need receipts. Let us port it when you need it shipped.
Self-serve audit
Free
Score and hours estimate, generated from your source tree.
- 7 static checks, weighted
- 0–100 score · A–F grade
- Port estimate in hours
- Findings with file:line
Full report
$349 / app
The static audit plus a captured-layout pass with receipts and a roadmap.
- Everything in self-serve
- Captured 7.8in layout pass
- Findings with file:line
- Remediation roadmap by effort
- Re-score included for 90 days
Porting service
From $4,900
A fixed-price port by engineers who shipped foldable UI.
- Full report included
- Sidebar + adaptive navigation
- Fold-state & scene lifecycles
- QA on device · ship-by date
Why port
The objections we hear, measured.
Parallel View already runs every app — why port?
It runs them — squeezed into the narrow column. Porting opts your app into the full inner display: a real sidebar on wide, scene lifecycles that survive the hinge, and a Fold-Ready Score you can print in your App Store listing.
Can a static check really judge how my UI looks?
The Fold-Ready audit is static plus a captured-layout pass: we build your app, open it on a 7.8in display, and pixel-check the frames. Findings cite file:line, not vibes.
We have no foldable hardware and no time.
You don't need either. The audit runs headless on your CI and returns an hours estimate; device QA is part of the porting tier, not your problem to source.
We're SwiftUI already — aren't we safe?
Mostly — the framework check is worth only 15% of the score. Navigation and layout carry the weight, and the index shows pure-SwiftUI apps still dropping to C for a single squeezed tab bar.